Keywords: Organizational Culture, Organizational Performance, Viettel Group, Employee Participation, Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), Digital Transformation, Organizational Effectiveness, Employee Empowerment, Global Competition, Management Implications.

[1] Alvesson, M. (2013). Understanding Organizational Culture (2nd Edition). Sage Publications, London.

[2] Siddique, A., Masood, O., et al. (2020). A comparative study of performance of commercial banks in Asian developing and developed countries. Insights into Regional Development, 2(2): 580–591.

[3] Thu, B.T.M. (2018). Corporate Culture and Its Impact on Employee Motivation. Doctoral Dissertation, National Economics University, Hanoi.

[4] Lieu, D.T. (2010). Business Culture of Vietnamese Enterprises in the Context of Integration. National Economics University Publishing House, Hanoi.

[5] Hai, D.H. (2014). Building a scale for measuring corporate culture in Vietnam. Journal of Economics & Development, 204: 45–54.

[6] Denison, D.R. (1990). Corporate Culture and Organizational Effectiveness. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

[7] Denison, D.R., Mishra, A.K. (1995). Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. Organization Science, 6(2): 204–223.

[8] Denison, D.R., Janovics, J., Young, J., et al. (2006). Diagnosing Organizational Cultures. Denison Consulting, Ann Arbor.

[9] Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., et al. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Edition). Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

[10] Le, H.D., et al. (2021). Impact of Working Capital Management on Business Performance: Case Study of Listed Companies. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(11): 5697–5706.

[11] Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations (2nd Edition). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

[12] Pham, H.V., et al. (2020). Impact of Corporate Entrepreneurship and Organizational Culture on Business Performance: The Role of Supply Chain Management. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(3): 1072.

[13] Hong, P.V., et al. (2021). Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(2): 251–257.

[14] Lin, S., Döngül, E.S., Uygun, S.V., et al. (2022). Exploring the relationship between abusive management, self-efficacy and organizational performance in the context of human–machine interaction technology and artificial intelligence. Sustainability, 14(4): 1949.

[15] Dung, T.K., Tam, T.T.T. (2012). Employee Engagement in Organizations. Journal of Economic Development, 266: 12–20.

[16] Viettel Group (2022). Annual Report. Hanoi.

[17] Ministry of Science and Technology (2020). Circular on the Management of Science and Technology Tasks. Hanoi.

[18] Anh, N.H. (2004). Organizational Culture and Operational Efficiency of Enterprises. Labor and Social Publishing House, Hanoi.

[19] Dat, N.D., Lan, N.T.N., Huy, D.T.N., et al. (2020). Plans for Better Business Performance of Sony in Japan and Suggestions for Management and Financial Accounting Transparency. Management, 24(2): 132–145.

[20] Quan, N.M. (2012). Building and Developing Vietnamese Corporate Culture. Labor and Social Publishing House, Hanoi.

[21] Hai, N.N. (2019). The Influence of Corporate Culture on Employee Engagement in Information Technology Enterprises. Journal of Commercial Science, 135: 56–65.

Source of Funding:

This study did not receive any grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not–for–profit sectors.

Competing Interests Statement:

The author declares no competing interests.

Consent for publication:

The author declares that he consented to the publication of this study.

Authors' contributions:

Author’s independent contribution.

Ethical Approval:

Not applicable for this study.

Institutional Review Board Statement:

Not applicable for this study.

Informed Consent:

Not applicable for this study.