This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the implementation of government assurances in Zambia, with a focus on the key sectors of finance, energy, water development, and education. Government assurances represent formal commitments made by government officials in response to parliamentary queries and serve as critical tools for ensuring accountability and transparency in governance. The study primarily examines the 2023 Action-Taken Report (ATR) presented to the National Assembly of Zambia, which details the progress made in fulfilling these assurances. Drawing on Public Accountability Theory, the paper explores how parliamentary oversight mechanisms influence the implementation of public policy, particularly in developing contexts. The research adopts a qualitative approach, utilizing secondary data from the ATR, supplemented by relevant academic literature and government publications. Thematic analysis was employed to identify patterns and recurring themes related to the implementation process, such as financial constraints, bureaucratic inefficiencies, and weak inter-ministerial coordination. Through this method, the study seeks to answer key research questions, including the extent to which government assurances have been implemented, the challenges hindering their execution, and potential strategies for improving the effectiveness of public policy in Zambia. The findings reveal that while progress has been made in some areas—such as the Zambia Growth Opportunities Programme and the Lusaka Sanitation Programme—significant barriers remain. Financial limitations due to Zambia’s debt burden, coupled with delays in international funding, have constrained the government’s ability to allocate sufficient resources for public projects. Additionally, bureaucratic inefficiencies, particularly in procurement processes and inter-ministerial coordination, have led to delays in project implementation, particularly in rural electrification and infrastructure development. In response to these challenges, the paper proposes several recommendations aimed at improving the implementation of government assurances. These include enhancing domestic revenue mobilization to reduce reliance on external funding, strengthening inter-ministerial coordination mechanisms, and reforming procurement processes to improve efficiency. Furthermore, the study highlights the importance of developing robust monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems to ensure timely tracking of project progress and to improve public accountability. By contributing to the broader discourse on governance and public policy in Zambia, this paper offers valuable insights for policymakers, government officials, and scholars interested in improving the effectiveness of government assurances in developing contexts. It emphasizes the need for comprehensive public sector reform and suggests pathways to strengthen the capacity of government institutions to deliver on their promises, ultimately improving service delivery and fostering public trust in government institutions.
Keywords: Government assurances, Public policy implementation, Accountability, Action-taken report (ATR), Financial constraints, Bureaucratic inefficiencies, Public-private partnerships (PPPs), Inter-ministerial coordination, Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems.
Alam, M., & Teicher, J. (2016). Public sector governance in developing countries: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Public Administration, 38(1): 53–67.
Bovens, M., Goodin, R.E., & Schillemans, T. (2014). The Oxford handbook of public accountability. Oxford University Press.
Chen, L. (2019). Public policy implementation in developing countries: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Public Administration, 45(2): 134–152.
Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
Khan, A. (2020). Government assurances and accountability in parliamentary democracies. Parliamentary Studies Quarterly, 22(3): 102–118.
Mumba, T., & Chomba, M. (2020). Challenges in the implementation of public projects in Zambia. Zambia Journal of Policy Studies, 12(1): 65–79.
Musonda, K. (2021). Monitoring and evaluation of government assurances: The Zambian experience. African Journal of Governance and Development, 6(2): 97–112.
Singh, R. (2019). The role of parliamentary committees in enhancing accountability: A case study of India’s Government Assurances Committee. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 65(4): 451–470.
Singh, R., & Bedi, P. (2021). The role of government assurances in public accountability. International Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 38(3): 201–215.
World Bank (2018). Public expenditure review in developing countries. World Bank Publications.
Yin, R.K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage Publications.
Source of Funding:
This study did not receive any grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing Interests Statement:
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest related to the work presented in this paper.
Consent for publication:
The authors declare that they consented to the publication of this study.
Authors' contributions:
Both the authors took part in literature review, analysis and manuscript writing equally.
Data Availability:
There is no research data outside the manuscript file.
A New Issue was published – Volume 7, Issue 3, 2024
07-07-2024 06-04-2024