This article systematically analyzes the scientific and theoretical foundations, classification criteria, and approaches to the types of corruption. Corruption cases from various sources are examined based on objects, subjects, and levels of authority. The article also highlights corrupt practices in public administration, parliament, enterprises, and electoral processes, as well as the misuse of resources for personal interests. In addition, the article proposes a classification of corruption based on the status of the subjects involved, territorial scope, recurrence rate, and field of activity, with particular attention given to corruption in the private sector and international corruption cases.

Keywords: Corruption, Classification, Government, Society, Human Rights, Public Administration, Political Ethics, Transparency, Accountability, Electoral Integrity, Resource Management, Anti-Corruption Strategies.

[1] Rottenberg, S. (1975). Comment. The Journal of Law and Economics, 18.

[2] Musheshe, N. (1994). NGO and mobilization against corruption. In Africa Leadership Forum, Corruption, democracy and human rights in East and Central Africa, Pages 133–134, Entebbe, Republic of Uganda: Ibadan.

[3] Scott, J.C. (1972). Comparative political corruption. New York, Pages 88.

[4] Proyava, S.M. (2008). Economization of corruption. Counteraction mechanism: Monograph, Pages 32–33.

[5] Akhmedov, I. (2003). Corruption lawlessness. Monitor.

[6] Beken, T.V. (2002). A European view on the Russian draft federal law 'On the fundamentals of anti-corruption policy'. State and Law, (6): 118.

[7] Naumov, Y.G. (2007). Corruption and society: Theoretical, economic and applied research. Monograph.

[8] Sobirovich, T. (2025). New Uzbekistan and political reform: The role of national strategies in strengthening governance. Indonesian Journal of Public Administration Review, 2(2): 12–12.

[9] Sobirovich, T.B. (2024). Socio-Philosophical Analysis of Society’s Ideosphere. Indonesian Journal of Social Development, 2(1).

Source of Funding:

This study received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing Interests Statement:

The author declares no competing interests related to this work.

Consent for publication:

The author declares that he/she consented to the publication of this study.

Authors' contributions:

Author’s independent contribution.

Institutional Review Board Statement:

Not applicable for this study.

Informed Consent:

Not applicable for this study.